Resilience of humanity
If global economy emerges from interaction dynamics between localized states, then each relatively resourceful state must hone a competitive culture through equitability mechanisms that empower the will for construct by a function reflective of individual merit. If some initial growth state is equable provision from counter to suppression, then within our sphere of history, from early life to advancement of the past century, is resilience of example by diversity that sustained to suggest developing markets from and for cultural equitability to the global outlook.
Without mechanisms for cooperation to create economic equitability through modernized channels that safeguard the diversity of state, those with protest susceptible to exploit by publicity through the proxy effects of current mechanisms must remain wary of economic motivation to stimulate self destructive revolution or mutually destructive armed conflict.
As a parallel in short, consider that normally open hall effect circuits and other semiconductor devices, irrespective of humanity, are conductive, and as wires without function of individual merit. Notwithstanding prevalent channels for representation and justice in globalization, extrinsic elements behind front of normative position induce current to charge mutual capacity through a channel of violation from each core in symmetric volatility. In turn, governments find themselves charged by local sentiment, within direction of response, to channel perception. Yet with humanity obligated by responsibility, dynamics of representation return rights integral and avoid casualty of friendship to reflect causality in justice such that casualty of friendship is avoided and the right integral returns.
Within this sphere of human history is peacemaking through a relatively equable provision of human empathy to a diversity of states, such that through our integration from justice toward respect for mutual rights there is a situation where responsible representatives avoid casualty of friendship from their integrity, and the response of right returns from the integrity of responsible representatives of equitability. If purpose is assumed from reaffirmation through stress to functions for fulfillment of justice and representation, then upon a platform to convene stakeholders there may be further materialization of agreement through bridging that is flexible to priorities and needs, yet firm by note that security, development and human rights are laterally interlinked and mutually reinforcing. Beneath a coherent approach to peace-building, the pathway to agreement sustains from the consent of the countries and states to accompany and to advocacy.